The Pacers' losing streak continues, now at 11 games, as they fall to the Spurs 123-113. But this game had a twist: the highly anticipated rookie sensation, Victor Wembanyama, was absent due to a knee injury.
In a thrilling Friday night matchup, De'Aaron Fox led the charge for the Spurs with 24 points, securing their first win since Wembanyama's injury. The Pacers, despite a valiant effort, couldn't stop the bleeding, losing their 11th consecutive game.
Wembanyama, the 7-foot-4 center, hyperextended his knee just two days prior, but thankfully, an MRI revealed no ligament damage. The Spurs, however, didn't seem to miss a beat without him, as they dominated the Pacers in Indianapolis.
Coach Mitch Johnson hinted at a potential return for Wembanyama against Portland on Saturday, but remained cautious. Interestingly, the Spurs have a 10-3 record when Wembanyama doesn't play, which raises the question: is the team better off without their star rookie? And here's where it gets controversial—should a team ever consider benching a healthy top draft pick?
The Spurs' offense was on full display, with Dylan Harper contributing 22 points and Stephon Castle adding 19. Indiana's Pascal Siakam led his team with a double-double, scoring 23 points and grabbing 10 rebounds. The Pacers' Micah Potter also stepped up with 16 points in his recent return to the starting lineup.
Despite the Pacers' high field goal percentage, the Spurs' free throw shooting was the difference maker. San Antonio went 22 for 28 from the line, while Indiana managed only 13 of 15. The Spurs also showed their depth, with six players scoring in double figures.
The game saw a back-and-forth third quarter, but the Spurs pulled away in the final period, showcasing their resilience. This victory sets up an intriguing matchup against Portland, while the Pacers look to end their skid in Orlando.
What do you think? Are the Spurs a better team without Wembanyama? Share your thoughts and let's spark a lively debate!
